Adapt external ideas

Borrow a method or review criterion when it solves a concrete gap. First check whether an existing Skill, stage reference or template can express it. Credit the source and preserve its licence requirements; popularity alone is not evidence that the approach improves research quality.

What you borrow	Where to adapt it
Research method or review criteria	Relevant guidance under content/skills/ or content/workflow/references/
Output structure	content/templates/ and the applicable research contract
Subject-specific knowledge	content/subjects/ or a domain profile
Host interaction pattern	Shared workflow guidance, with narrow routing and reply-only behaviour preserved
Executable capability	The existing native service or Host integration, with a verified public tool contract

Keep task IDs and source anchors stable. A broad external prompt can be separated into existing tasks; it does not justify adding a second workflow framework. Do not import arbitrary fixed role counts, mandatory discussion rounds or output quotas. Retain evidence requirements, user permissions and method-specific limits.

Check the proposed change with relevant examples and affected tests. Report self-review as self-review; an independent-agent claim requires a returned result from an actual agent. See extension guidance and editing conventions.